Imagine you’ve poured your heart and soul into building your small business. You’ve crafted a catchy trade name, designed a compelling logo, and are finally signing contracts with clients and suppliers. You feel like you’re operating professionally, establishing your brand in the marketplace. But what if the very trade name you’re so proud of could inadvertently expose you to significant personal liability?
It’s a scenario many small business owners overlook, potentially to their detriment. Contracting under a trade name without clearly disclosing the underlying legal entity can blur the lines of responsibility, potentially leaving you, the individual, personally on the hook for business debts and obligations. The Washington State Court of Appeals case, Crown Controls, Inc. v. Smiley, 47 Wash.App. 832, 737 P.2d 670 (1987), serves as a stark reminder of this very risk.
Understanding the Distinction: Trade Name vs. Legal Name
Before diving into the legal implications, it’s crucial to understand the difference between a trade name and a legal business name.
- Legal Business Name: This is the officially registered name of your business entity with the relevant state authorities. If you’ve formed a limited liability company (LLC), corporation, or other legal structure, this is the name under which your business is legally recognized. It often includes designators like “LLC,” “Inc.,” or “Corp.”
- Trade Name (or “Doing Business As” – DBA): This is a name you use to market and operate your business that is different from your legal business name. It allows you to create a brand identity that resonates with your customers. For sole proprietorships and partnerships, the trade name might simply be a name other than the owner’s personal name or the partners’ names. Even incorporated entities might use a trade name for specific product lines or marketing purposes.
While using a trade name is a common and often necessary part of branding, the Crown Controls case highlights the critical importance of clearly linking that trade name back to the legal entity when entering into contracts.
The Crown Controls Case: A Cautionary Tale
In Crown Controls, the plaintiff, Crown Controls, Inc., entered into a purchase agreement with “Industrial Associates”, a trade name owned by North American Drill Supply, Inc. (NADS), a company owned by Jim Smiley. When Crown Controls initiated suit, they included Smiley as a party. The court ultimately held Smiley personally liable for the debt. The reasoning was simple: by contracting solely under the trade name “Industrial Associates” without disclosing the “principal” (NADS), Smiley failed to adequately notify Crown Controls that it was dealing with a business entity distinct from Smiley himself. The court emphasized that a party contracting with a trade name is entitled to know the legal identity of the individual or entity they are dealing with to assess their financial responsibility and legal recourse.
Why Disclosure Matters
The Crown Controls decision underscores the principle that using a trade name alone doesn’t automatically shield the individual behind it from personal liability. Several key legal concepts come into play:
- Lack of Notice: When you contract solely under a trade name, the other party may reasonably assume they are contracting with that specific entity. If that “entity” is not a legally recognized structure separate from you, the individual, you haven’t provided adequate notice of the true contracting party.
- Limited Liability Protection: If you’ve formed an LLC or corporation, one of the primary benefits is the separation of your personal assets from business liabilities. This “corporate veil” can protect you from being personally sued for business debts. However, if you contract solely under a trade name without clearly indicating your LLC or corporate status, you risk the argument that the other party wasn’t aware they were dealing with a legal entity. This could potentially lead a court to “pierce the corporate veil” and hold you personally liable, especially if there are other factors suggesting a lack of clear separation between you and your business.
Practical Steps to Protect Yourself
The lessons from Crown Controls are clear. To mitigate the risk of personal liability when using a trade name, follow these essential practices:
- Clearly Identify Your Legal Business Name: In all contracts, invoices, and formal business documents, explicitly state your legal business name followed by “doing business as” or “d/b/a” and your trade name. For example: “ABC Innovations LLC, d/b/a Stellar Marketing Solutions.”
- Use Your Legal Name on Official Documents: Ensure your legal business name is used on bank accounts, licenses, permits, and legal filings.
- Communicate Clearly: When engaging in business dealings, especially during initial discussions and contract negotiations, clearly communicate the legal structure of your business.
- Review Existing Contracts: If you have existing contracts signed solely under your trade name, consider amending them to include your legal business name.
- Seek Legal Advice: Consult with an attorney to ensure your business structure is properly established and that your contracting practices adequately protect you from personal liability. They can provide tailored advice based on your specific business and jurisdiction.
Don’t Let Your Brand Become a Liability Building a strong brand through a compelling trade name is a valuable asset for any business. However, it’s crucial to remember that a trade name is simply a marketing tool. It doesn’t, on its own, create a separate legal entity or shield you from personal liability. The Crown Controls case serves as a powerful reminder that transparency and clear disclosure of your legal business name are paramount. By taking the necessary steps to properly identify your business entity in all your dealings, you can protect your personal assets and ensure that your entrepreneurial journey isn’t jeopardized by a preventable legal pitfall. Don’t let the allure of your trade name overshadow the critical need for legal clarity.
Leave a Reply